Total Conservation Programs in Mitchell County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 167
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mitchell County, Texas totaled $568,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Harold E Morren | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $3,146 |
62 | Charles Dwayne Stubblefield | Denison, TX 75021 | $3,129 |
63 | Huron Dorn Farm | Dublin, TX 76446 | $2,934 |
64 | , | $2,844 | |
65 | Don Mathis | Austin, TX 78730 | $2,818 |
66 | Gary Mathis | Stamford, TX 79553 | $2,817 |
67 | Karen Y Holman | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,777 |
68 | Juanita C Briseno Trust | Midland, TX 79706 | $2,716 |
69 | Donald Smith | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,545 |
70 | Clyde Emmons Enterprises Inc | Frisco, TX 75033 | $2,526 |
71 | Km & Rk Land Lp | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,484 |
72 | Edward Morren Estate A Partnership | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,442 |
73 | Donna Baker | Abilene, TX 79606 | $2,426 |
74 | Kathleen Richters | Coahoma, TX 79511 | $2,426 |
75 | Richard Lee Hester | Snyder, TX 79549 | $2,406 |
76 | Native Prairies Assoc Of Texas | Manchaca, TX 78652 | $2,367 |
77 | Tommy Morris | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,332 |
78 | Scott Morris | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $2,332 |
79 | Marla J Ratliff | Cameron, TX 76520 | $2,279 |
80 | Janet C Rodgers | New Braunfels, TX 78132 | $2,255 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”