Farm Subsidy information
Mitchell County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Mitchell County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,198
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mitchell County, Texas totaled $257,572,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Cheryl J Hoyle | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $448,182 |
82 | Mark Mcdaniel | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $443,688 |
83 | Kirk Morris | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $433,184 |
84 | Tony P Turner | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $428,243 |
85 | Mickey T Neff | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $427,073 |
86 | Katherine Parsons Rich | Westbrook, TX 79565 | $419,550 |
87 | Warren Zant | Westbrook, TX 79565 | $402,671 |
88 | Kelsey Ann Raschke | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $398,610 |
89 | Max Von Roeder | Snyder, TX 79549 | $397,387 |
90 | Bradley D Thompson | Roscoe, TX 79545 | $395,362 |
91 | Carl Guelker | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $394,942 |
92 | Garcia Farms Dba | Loraine, TX 79532 | $390,855 |
93 | Blanche Morgan Trust | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $387,516 |
94 | Toni Sue Everett | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $386,876 |
95 | Mcmillan Children | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $381,719 |
96 | Hubert F Dunn | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $373,934 |
97 | D M Smith | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $368,907 |
98 | Brennand Lazy H Ranch Ltd | Houston, TX 77057 | $363,435 |
99 | Scott Morris | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $360,567 |
100 | First Bank & Trust Co ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $354,450 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”