Emergency Conservation Program in Mitchell County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 52
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Mitchell County, Texas totaled $192,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Maddox Ranch Partnership | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $26,338 |
2 | Strain Ranches | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $20,291 |
3 | Cox Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $16,277 |
4 | Howard A Morrison | Midland, TX 79705 | $11,170 |
5 | Tom A Morrison Iv | Westbrook, TX 79565 | $11,170 |
6 | S L Martin Inc | Ira, TX 79527 | $10,867 |
7 | Spade Ranches Limited | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $8,788 |
8 | Harris Branch & Mcmichael Etal | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $6,915 |
9 | Ernie Joe Wood | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $6,409 |
10 | Rolling Hills Investment Group Ll | Malakoff, TX 75148 | $5,229 |
11 | Lea Smartt Heirs | Wichita Falls, TX 76308 | $5,196 |
12 | Coke County Red Cloud LLC | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $4,086 |
13 | John Burton Mayse | Pleasanton, TX 78064 | $4,048 |
14 | Trulock & Sons | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $3,944 |
15 | Byron Byrne III | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $3,458 |
16 | Datha C Johnson | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $3,458 |
17 | Austin O Mccloud | Eastland, TX 76448 | $3,125 |
18 | Frank Ginzel | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,370 |
19 | Bernice J Howard Tr | Fort Worth, TX 76113 | $2,345 |
20 | Patrick Barber | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,324 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>