Total Conservation Programs in Mitchell County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 837
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mitchell County, Texas totaled $39,783,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | A K Guthrie | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $196,317 |
42 | James Cox Trust | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $194,321 |
43 | Woodrow W Anderson | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $191,975 |
44 | Coty Strain | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $190,657 |
45 | Cedar Bend Land LLC | Goldsmith, TX 79741 | $189,705 |
46 | Juanita C Briseno | Loraine, TX 79532 | $186,605 |
47 | Wesley Seibold | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $184,983 |
48 | William F Everett | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $184,286 |
49 | Donald L Graham | Loraine, TX 79532 | $179,351 |
50 | Monte C Mccright | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $171,460 |
51 | Anna Elnora Mitchell | Loraine, TX 79532 | $168,723 |
52 | Joyce Ann Adams | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $167,712 |
53 | Reed Stewart 1999 Trust | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $164,794 |
54 | Two Harts Enterprises Inc | Meadowlakes, TX 78654 | $164,181 |
55 | Austin O Mccloud | Eastland, TX 76448 | $162,226 |
56 | Tom A Cotton | Hermleigh, TX 79526 | $161,617 |
57 | Clay Mann Peak LLC | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $159,688 |
58 | Chukar Ridge Ranch Llp | Longview, TX 75604 | $154,213 |
59 | Don Hines | Midland, TX 79705 | $153,160 |
60 | Troy A Powell | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $152,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”