Total Conservation Programs in Moore County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 457
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Moore County, Texas totaled $26,311,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Devine Franz Ranch LLC | Pacific, MO 63069 | $116,046 |
62 | The W H Brian Tr | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $115,572 |
63 | Sullivan Estate Partnership | Wellington, TX 79095 | $114,673 |
64 | Everett Timmons | Borger, TX 79007 | $114,062 |
65 | Dan Mcdowell | Sunray, TX 79086 | $113,251 |
66 | Linda J Brian | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $108,359 |
67 | The Priscilla Chase Sullivan 1991 | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $107,477 |
68 | Trent Breland | Dumas, TX 79029 | $106,622 |
69 | Richard R Roberts | Dumas, TX 79029 | $103,237 |
70 | Stringer Farms Inc | Dumas, TX 79029 | $102,132 |
71 | J Craig Stokes | Dumas, TX 79029 | $100,755 |
72 | Willie Mae Garrett | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $100,432 |
73 | Howard Beauchamp Jr | Dumas, TX 79029 | $100,237 |
74 | Casey Brandon Kimbrell | Sunray, TX 79086 | $96,085 |
75 | Taylor Properties | Wichita Falls, TX 76301 | $95,573 |
76 | Planetierra Three Partnership | Sunray, TX 79086 | $95,399 |
77 | Annie Mae Kimbrell | Sunray, TX 79086 | $93,683 |
78 | County Line Farms-ii | Dumas, TX 79029 | $90,904 |
79 | Floyd Blackburn | Dumas, TX 79029 | $90,244 |
80 | Ez Land & Cattle Co Ltd | Albany, TX 76430 | $89,658 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”