Farm Subsidy information
Moore County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Moore County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 216
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Moore County, Texas totaled $20,889,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jack R Evans Dba Evans Custom Cattle Care | Dumas, TX 79029 | $20,673 |
82 | Margaret Morton Revocable Trust | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $20,417 |
83 | Maltese Cross Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79101 | $20,030 |
84 | J2b Farms | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $19,870 |
85 | Howard Beauchamp Jr | Dumas, TX 79029 | $19,479 |
86 | Wanda Ruhl Stokes | Dumas, TX 79029 | $18,699 |
87 | Shellberg Family Trust/sunray Farm | Aurora, CO 80013 | $18,615 |
88 | Earl Henderson Trust | Morse, TX 79062 | $18,318 |
89 | Silver Sky Farms, LLC | Dumas, TX 79029 | $18,047 |
90 | Tolleson Farms | Stinnett, TX 79083 | $17,543 |
91 | Charles R Pendleton | Dumas, TX 79029 | $16,697 |
92 | Darall Satterfield | Stinnett, TX 79083 | $16,602 |
93 | Glennie Family Dynasty Trust | Mckinney, TX 75072 | $16,474 |
94 | Jaybird Farms LLC | Fair Oaks Ranch, TX 78015 | $15,779 |
95 | Johnson, Johnson, Mccurdy & Lewis Partnership | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $15,650 |
96 | Derrick Ranch Inc | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $15,164 |
97 | Doris M Harbert | Piedmont, OK 73078 | $15,046 |
98 | Drip It LLC | Fort Loramie, OH 45845 | $15,015 |
99 | Dos Amigos Cattle LLC | Dumas, TX 79029 | $14,823 |
100 | G & G Cattle Company | Dumas, TX 79029 | $14,491 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”