Total Conservation Programs in Moore County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 457
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Moore County, Texas totaled $26,311,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Priscilla Chase Sullivan | Wellington, TX 79095 | $61,330 |
122 | Phyllis Ann Carlin | Wellington, TX 79095 | $61,312 |
123 | Robert L Harbert | Channing, TX 79018 | $60,246 |
124 | A Colleen Sturgeon | Abilene, TX 79606 | $60,102 |
125 | Jody Stone Farms | Sunray, TX 79086 | $57,012 |
126 | John H Goodwin And Nellie B Goodwin Family Trust | Sunray, TX 79086 | $56,466 |
127 | Janet Sue Drake | Canyon, TX 79015 | $55,873 |
128 | Dennis P Caldwell | Borger, TX 79007 | $55,812 |
129 | Earl Henderson Trust | Morse, TX 79062 | $54,095 |
130 | Wendell Bose | Round Rock, TX 78664 | $53,862 |
131 | Webb-pickens Ptn | Colorado Springs, CO 80920 | $53,640 |
132 | Jcw Farms Ltd | Dumas, TX 79029 | $52,634 |
133 | Golden Spread Electric Coop Inc | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $52,608 |
134 | Wayne & Brent Clark Ptnship | Dumas, TX 79029 | $51,154 |
135 | D & H Younger Land And Cattle, LLC | Boerne, TX 78015 | $51,044 |
136 | Paul Hays | Kress, TX 79052 | $50,302 |
137 | D & S Ponder Investments Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $50,000 |
138 | Robert Reznik | Dumas, TX 79029 | $49,615 |
139 | Elvin D Lamb | Bushland, TX 79012 | $49,480 |
140 | David Bose | Hays, KS 67601 | $49,159 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”