Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Parmer County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 175
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Parmer County, Texas totaled $1,575,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Nichols Investing Llp | Farwell, TX 79325 | $6,331 |
82 | J J & N G Company | Georgetown, TX 78628 | $6,290 |
83 | Daryl Kirkpatrick | Lubbock, TX 79464 | $6,274 |
84 | Sheek Farm Ptr | Spring Branch, TX 78070 | $6,131 |
85 | Ricky Don Jamerson | Friona, TX 79035 | $6,089 |
86 | D'lynn Jamerson | Friona, TX 79035 | $6,089 |
87 | Todd & Katie Ware | Bovina, TX 79009 | $6,051 |
88 | Blayne Dee Baxter | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $5,647 |
89 | O H Jones Trust | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $5,601 |
90 | Mary Belle Washington | Logan, UT 84321 | $5,558 |
91 | B-r Rejino Inc | Friona, TX 79035 | $5,540 |
92 | C W & Tim Meeks Partnership | Friona, TX 79035 | $5,508 |
93 | J W Gammon Estate | Friona, TX 79035 | $5,277 |
94 | Catfish Draw Farms Inc | Farwell, TX 79325 | $5,210 |
95 | J D - B Farms Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $4,875 |
96 | J D S Farms Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $4,875 |
97 | Circle C Farms | Farwell, TX 79325 | $4,703 |
98 | Jimmie Dale Seaton | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $4,594 |
99 | E Bruce Curry | Kerrville, TX 78028 | $4,509 |
100 | Jerry Don Glover | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $4,458 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”