Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Pecos County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 69
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Pecos County, Texas totaled $1,847,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | C Foster Cox | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $7,754 |
42 | Roy Deaton Jr | Sanderson, TX 79848 | $7,589 |
43 | , | $7,172 | |
44 | Nancy Hammond | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $6,974 |
45 | Coots Ranch | Sheffield, TX 79781 | $6,938 |
46 | Woodward Mountain Ranches Partner | Girvin, TX 79740 | $6,839 |
47 | J Bar E Partnership | Iraan, TX 79744 | $6,086 |
48 | Weldon R Blackwelder | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $5,847 |
49 | Trent Huckaby | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $5,315 |
50 | Kurt C Huckaby | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $4,968 |
51 | Suter Farms LLC | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $4,961 |
52 | Raymundo P Franco Jr | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $4,695 |
53 | Will Luke Groth | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $4,410 |
54 | Paul Golliher | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $4,294 |
55 | Alvaro Mandujano Jr | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $3,669 |
56 | Elton Randal Hartman | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $3,171 |
57 | The Grey Ranch Company | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $3,073 |
58 | Puckett Ranches Ltd | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $3,038 |
59 | , | $3,037 | |
60 | Matthew Scot Garvin | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $2,956 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”