Market Loss Assistance Program in Pecos County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 135
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Pecos County, Texas totaled $2,693,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John C Dominguez | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $1,935 |
102 | J & B Hoelscher Farms Inc | Midland, TX 79702 | $1,793 |
103 | W H Freeman | Ft. Worth, TX 76111 | $1,732 |
104 | Darlene V Bryan | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $1,575 |
105 | Ray Eck | Turlock, CA 95382 | $1,382 |
106 | L Burl Pringle | Girvin, TX 79740 | $1,215 |
107 | Marjorie H Hoelscher | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $1,174 |
108 | Eddie Odom | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $1,166 |
109 | Jerry Davenport | Wapanucka, OK 73461 | $1,163 |
110 | Jerome F Hoelscher Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $1,111 |
111 | Candy Mcintyre | Iraan, TX 79744 | $1,047 |
112 | C Len Bennett | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $1,045 |
113 | Gary Dale Drgac | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $806 |
114 | Joe Holladay | Post, TX 79356 | $788 |
115 | Roger R Coots | Sheffield, TX 79781 | $777 |
116 | Jimmy Watts | Iraan, TX 79744 | $546 |
117 | Jay Oates | Balmorhea, TX 79718 | $533 |
118 | Arthur Dunlap II | Austin, TX 78729 | $533 |
119 | Vera Dunlap Martin | Austin, TX 78759 | $533 |
120 | L William Culkins | Palm Desert, CA 92211 | $488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”