Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Potter County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 82
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Potter County, Texas totaled $6,504,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Micheal Lamkin | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $1,582 |
62 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,541 |
63 | Marlene Nelson | Valle De Oro, TX 79010 | $1,198 |
64 | Jim D Williams | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $1,101 |
65 | Carlos Chacon Olivas | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $1,069 |
66 | Bill Kinzer Dba 3k Cattle Co | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $1,042 |
67 | Three D's | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $972 |
68 | Gary Daniel Cattle Company | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $894 |
69 | Matilde Olivas | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $860 |
70 | William W. Kinzer Dba 3k Cattle C | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $751 |
71 | Jan Eileen Bailey | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $593 |
72 | Jon Bell | Boys Ranch, TX 79010 | $552 |
73 | David M Whitaker | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $544 |
74 | Cindy Whitaker | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $544 |
75 | Bob Burdette | Valle De Oro, TX 79010 | $390 |
76 | Duane Zortman | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $300 |
77 | , | $211 | |
78 | Matilde Olvas | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $209 |
79 | Richard Lee Jennings Revocable Living Trust | Bushland, TX 79012 | $136 |
80 | , | $47 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”