Farm Subsidy information
Potter County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Potter County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 577
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Potter County, Texas totaled $58,217,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jim D Williams | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $440,076 |
22 | Anna Marie Sanning Revocable Livi | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $379,168 |
23 | Peggy Stinnett | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $378,634 |
24 | Masterson Stock Growers L L C | Guthrie, TX 79236 | $376,912 |
25 | George Michael Menke | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $375,385 |
26 | Frank L Bezner | Bushland, TX 79012 | $352,154 |
27 | Duane Zortman | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $331,958 |
28 | Currie Smith I Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79110 | $325,260 |
29 | Rozella Kenedy | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $321,036 |
30 | Raymond Brown | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $312,548 |
31 | Menke Farms Inc | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $311,443 |
32 | Tru Land Realty LLC | Amarillo, TX 79101 | $296,595 |
33 | Caroline Bush Emeny Tr 86 | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $291,165 |
34 | Jerry Don Artho | Paris, TX 75461 | $287,777 |
35 | Frying Pan Ventures Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $274,388 |
36 | Billy R Hefley | Briscoe, TX 79011 | $266,935 |
37 | Bush Partnership Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $263,510 |
38 | Gary Daniel Cattle Company | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $258,543 |
39 | Frying Pan Cattle Limited | Amarillo, TX 79159 | $242,322 |
40 | Ray Sanning | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $237,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”