Farm Subsidy information
Potter County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Potter County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 90
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Potter County, Texas totaled $3,723,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Corsino Cattle Co. | Amarillo, TX 79101 | $679,684 |
2 | Lx Cattle Company | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $322,666 |
3 | North Canadian Cattle Co. LLC | Amarillo, TX 79101 | $207,088 |
4 | , | $166,521 | |
5 | Currie Smith I Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79110 | $124,420 |
6 | Beaumont S Boyce Dba Masterson & Stinnett Livestoc | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $62,947 |
7 | Marshall Carrall Cutright Jr | Amarillo, TX 79116 | $59,438 |
8 | Mason Brothers Dba Mason Land & Cattle | Wildorado, TX 79098 | $45,616 |
9 | Ute Creek Livestock LLC | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $36,570 |
10 | Alpha Three Cattle Company | Amarillo, TX 79114 | $26,543 |
11 | Joe Rae Richardson | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $25,079 |
12 | Frank M Wink | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $20,593 |
13 | Harold Bertrand | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $19,219 |
14 | Bmg Farms | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $10,556 |
15 | Brett Britten | Groom, TX 79039 | $10,265 |
16 | B12 Cattle Company LLC | Canyon, TX 79015 | $9,665 |
17 | Karen Shepherd | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $9,116 |
18 | Phillip Smith | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $8,674 |
19 | Dave Anderson | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $8,349 |
20 | K & D Ranch LLC | Amarillo, TX 79120 | $8,139 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>