Total Disaster Programs in Potter County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 303
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Potter County, Texas totaled $16,174,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Smith And Smith Cattle Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79110 | $150,730 |
22 | Mark Jones | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $147,410 |
23 | Alpha Three Cattle Company | Amarillo, TX 79114 | $145,732 |
24 | David M Whitaker | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $144,662 |
25 | Ute Creek Livestock LLC | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $134,637 |
26 | Phillip Smith | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $128,913 |
27 | Alamosa Land & Cattle Co Inc | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $98,326 |
28 | Menke Farms Inc | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $92,825 |
29 | B12 Cattle Company LLC | Canyon, TX 79015 | $91,482 |
30 | K & D Ranch LLC | Amarillo, TX 79120 | $90,521 |
31 | Berne Barton | Valle De Oro, TX 79010 | $89,703 |
32 | Cindy Whitaker | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $89,138 |
33 | Peggy Stinnett | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $82,159 |
34 | Collard & Groves Cattle Company | Amarillo, TX 79159 | $81,901 |
35 | F G Collard III | Amarillo, TX 79159 | $79,532 |
36 | Harold Bertrand | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $76,215 |
37 | Donald W Homen | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $72,058 |
38 | Pecunia Inc | Santa Fe, NM 87507 | $69,337 |
39 | Jerry Don Artho | Paris, TX 75461 | $68,387 |
40 | Johnson Burns Co | Amarillo, TX 79120 | $66,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”