Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Potter County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 40
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Potter County, Texas totaled $286,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Corsino Cattle Co. | Amarillo, TX 79101 | $130,474 |
2 | Alpha Three Cattle Company | Amarillo, TX 79114 | $26,543 |
3 | Beaumont S Boyce Dba Masterson & Stinnett Livestoc | Amarillo, TX 79105 | $23,133 |
4 | North Canadian Cattle Co. LLC | Amarillo, TX 79101 | $22,383 |
5 | Currie Smith I Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79110 | $14,460 |
6 | Marshall Carrall Cutright Jr | Amarillo, TX 79116 | $9,868 |
7 | B12 Cattle Company LLC | Canyon, TX 79015 | $9,665 |
8 | K & D Ranch LLC | Amarillo, TX 79120 | $8,139 |
9 | Pecunia Inc | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $5,212 |
10 | Harold Bertrand | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $3,965 |
11 | Mason Brothers Dba Mason Land & Cattle | Wildorado, TX 79098 | $3,741 |
12 | , | $3,222 | |
13 | Hefley Hives LLC | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $3,219 |
14 | Frank M Wink | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $2,626 |
15 | Ronald Neusch | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $2,546 |
16 | Steven R Donnell | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $1,934 |
17 | Steven Ray Anderson-anderson Beefmaster Cattle, Ll | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $1,883 |
18 | Dave Anderson | Amarillo, TX 79108 | $1,756 |
19 | Berne Barton | Valle De Oro, TX 79010 | $1,690 |
20 | Phillip Smith | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $1,503 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>