Farm Subsidy information
Reagan County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Reagan County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 222
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Reagan County, Texas totaled $8,069,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Streicher Farms Inc | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $48,802 |
| 22 | Daniel Michalewicz | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $48,551 |
| 23 | Elkins Ranch LLC | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $47,494 |
| 24 | Whit Braden | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $46,057 |
| 25 | Lashae L Braden | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $42,702 |
| 26 | Aleman Farms Inc | Wall, TX 76957 | $39,588 |
| 27 | M H Farm Services Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $38,621 |
| 28 | Shawna Braden | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $38,356 |
| 29 | Rocking H Meyer Farms, Inc. | Garden City, TX 79739 | $38,225 |
| 30 | Michael Streicher | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $37,983 |
| 31 | Blaise Wilde | Wall, TX 76957 | $37,675 |
| 32 | G&e Cotton Farms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $36,982 |
| 33 | Mesquite Trading Co | San Antonio, TX 78278 | $35,677 |
| 34 | Patrick Strauss | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $34,786 |
| 35 | Elkins Ranch LLC | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $33,850 |
| 36 | Kds Cotton Farms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $33,374 |
| 37 | Anastacio Perez Iv | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $32,644 |
| 38 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $32,641 |
| 39 | Floyd & Martha Schwartz Farms | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $31,572 |
| 40 | Wilde Family Properties Ltd | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $31,143 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf