Conservation Reserve Program in Reeves County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 242
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Reeves County, Texas totaled $20,660,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pearce Trust | Pecos, TX 79772 | $136,851 |
42 | Louise Taylor | Pecos, TX 79772 | $135,149 |
43 | Bette S Toone | Saragosa, TX 79780 | $134,981 |
44 | Condit Agribusiness Inc | Lubbock, TX 79413 | $133,579 |
45 | James R Davis | Seminole, TX 79360 | $133,353 |
46 | Virginia R Cover | Adkins, TX 78101 | $130,917 |
47 | C J Collum | Perkins, OK 74059 | $128,322 |
48 | Roy Pearce Sr Trust | Pecos, TX 79772 | $127,523 |
49 | Donald R Cover | Adkins, TX 78101 | $123,458 |
50 | C & S Investments Gen Prtn | Lubbock, TX 79408 | $116,566 |
51 | Randy Taylor | Pecos, TX 79772 | $115,160 |
52 | Bobbie H Lattner | Pecos, TX 79772 | $115,111 |
53 | William Dub Sutherland Dba Sk Far | San Antonio, TX 78205 | $114,639 |
54 | C L R Taylor & Co Inc | Pecos, TX 79772 | $112,052 |
55 | Seledonio Contreras Renteria | Mentone, TX 79754 | $112,028 |
56 | Freda Blahosky Trust | Colorado Springs, CO 80920 | $111,360 |
57 | Abraham Gutierrez Lujan | Pecos, TX 79772 | $107,847 |
58 | Jose R Munoz | Pecos, TX 79772 | $107,316 |
59 | Patricia Briggs | Abilene, TX 79603 | $106,005 |
60 | Dill Land & Cattle LLC | Wolfforth, TX 79382 | $104,539 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”