Counter Cyclical Program in Refugio County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 514
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Refugio County, Texas totaled $17,551,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Stephen C Rooke Trustee | Woodsboro, TX 78393 | $41,204 |
82 | Gsh Land Ltd | Corpus Christi, TX 78401 | $41,024 |
83 | Skelton Farm Inc | Austin, TX 78746 | $35,058 |
84 | Lee Nell Boenig | Woodsboro, TX 78393 | $33,913 |
85 | G D Robbins Estate Partnership | Bayside, TX 78340 | $33,562 |
86 | Ansley Farm Inc | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $33,023 |
87 | Marie O'connor Sorenson | Victoria, TX 77902 | $30,830 |
88 | Donald M Teer | Georgetown, TX 78633 | $29,875 |
89 | Fred N Fagan | Tivoli, TX 77990 | $29,417 |
90 | H C Hultgren Jr | Baton Rouge, LA 70810 | $29,081 |
91 | Ford-powers Family Properties Ltd | Corpus Christi, TX 78412 | $29,037 |
92 | Ford-allen Family Properties Ltd | Corpus Christi, TX 78412 | $29,037 |
93 | Clara E Bauer | Refugio, TX 78377 | $28,740 |
94 | Tierra Padre Partners | Refugio, TX 78377 | $28,688 |
95 | Alvin R Niemann | Woodsboro, TX 78393 | $28,401 |
96 | Otto Schuster | Portland, TX 78374 | $28,323 |
97 | Marjorie Hartmann Claybrook | Woodsboro, TX 78393 | $27,826 |
98 | Callaway-woolsey Farms | Corpus Christi, TX 78478 | $27,808 |
99 | Linda Reynolds | Red Rock, TX 78662 | $27,385 |
100 | Michael Cooley Trust | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $25,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”