Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $2,856,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | White Rock Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $660,952 |
2 | Chapotal Farms | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $643,977 |
3 | Respondek Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $482,868 |
4 | G & H Farms | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $299,733 |
5 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $281,934 |
6 | Starr Feedyards Ltd | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $152,861 |
7 | J Bar Land & Cattle Co Lc | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $105,761 |
8 | Wesley J Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $77,233 |
9 | Eusebio Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $29,224 |
10 | Romualdo Solis Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $26,941 |
11 | Darian J Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $21,530 |
12 | Aracely Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $19,172 |
13 | Campbell A Patton | Mission, TX 78573 | $16,338 |
14 | Silverio Gabriel Saenz | Mission, TX 78573 | $12,082 |
15 | Guadalupe Perez Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $9,323 |
16 | Isaac V Sulemana | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $5,423 |
17 | Frances S Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $4,393 |
18 | William Douglas Cameron | San Antonio, TX 78254 | $3,224 |
19 | Malechek And Westmoland Family Lp | Barksdale, TX 78828 | $2,042 |
20 | Corydon J Kobernat | San Antonio, TX 78233 | $828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>