Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 328
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $3,244,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Trico Vegetable Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $27,700 |
22 | Don Cameron Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $26,009 |
23 | C R Pena Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $25,889 |
24 | Blas Pedro Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $25,264 |
25 | Ana Lisa Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $25,187 |
26 | Amaro Salinas | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $25,162 |
27 | Fernando Pena | Roma, TX 78584 | $24,603 |
28 | Arturo D Ibarra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $24,005 |
29 | Dora P Villarreal | Guerra, TX 78360 | $22,955 |
30 | Lch | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $22,520 |
31 | B & L Farms Inc | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $21,604 |
32 | A & R Farms | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $20,976 |
33 | Maria Elia Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $20,948 |
34 | 2 M Ranch Inc | Mission, TX 78572 | $20,162 |
35 | Jose Pedro Olivares | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $20,114 |
36 | Amando Pena Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $19,972 |
37 | G L And C LLC | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $19,551 |
38 | Roberto Saul Margo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $19,462 |
39 | Raymond Ones C Best Dds | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $19,416 |
40 | Romeo G Canales | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $18,759 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”