Counter Cyclical Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 264
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $6,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Victor M Ramirez | Roma, TX 78584 | $178 |
202 | B & L Farms Inc | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $178 |
203 | Rodolfo T Garza | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $173 |
204 | Ruben Roberto Guerra | Roma, TX 78584 | $166 |
205 | Mateo Solis | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $161 |
206 | Conrado Rivas | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $160 |
207 | Rancho De Mis Suenos | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $160 |
208 | Jose Manuel Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $134 |
209 | Est Of Demetrio Garcia | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $133 |
210 | Uvaldo Salinas | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $132 |
211 | Peter Boone Lagrange | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $130 |
212 | Pamela Ann Dodson | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $129 |
213 | Rosendo Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $128 |
214 | Grande Butane Co Inc | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $124 |
215 | Reyes Romeo Lopez | Mission, TX 78573 | $123 |
216 | Jesus Humberto Munoz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $120 |
217 | Juan Manuel Escobar | Roma, TX 78584 | $119 |
218 | Raul Corona | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $108 |
219 | Carolyn Vance Cook Trust | Mcallen, TX 78505 | $108 |
220 | Nance E Munoz | Roma, TX 78584 | $88 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”