Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 192
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $490,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Noe O Pena | San Antonio, TX 78228 | $2,500 |
42 | Blas Maria Saenz Sr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $2,500 |
43 | Gary Schwarz | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $2,500 |
44 | Oscar Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
45 | Rene Munoz III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
46 | Noe G Garza | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $2,500 |
47 | Lauro Canales | Riverside, CA 92506 | $2,500 |
48 | Sabina A Santoscoy | San Antonio, TX 78228 | $2,500 |
49 | Homero Salinas | San Juan, TX 78589 | $2,500 |
50 | Jose Arturo Garza | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $2,500 |
51 | Leonel Lopez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
52 | Arturo D Ibarra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
53 | Horacio Elizondo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
54 | Fernando A Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
55 | Anita Rosa | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,500 |
56 | Arturo A Garza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
57 | Mario Garcia | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $2,500 |
58 | Roberto Saul Margo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
59 | Raul Villarreal | Delmita, TX 78536 | $2,500 |
60 | Reynaldo Ramirez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”