Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 234
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $436,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Raul Munoz | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,132 |
42 | Miguel A Montalvo | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $2,087 |
43 | Amclo Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,022 |
44 | San Marcos Ranch Lp | Mission, TX 78572 | $1,970 |
45 | Paula R Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,970 |
46 | Rafael Carrera Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,911 |
47 | R E Schiefelbein III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,898 |
48 | Placido Pena Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,878 |
49 | Running E Cattle Co LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,716 |
50 | Reymar Cattle Company LLC | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $1,682 |
51 | Noel Arturo Zamora | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $1,656 |
52 | Jorge Luis Zapata | Falcon Heights, TX 78545 | $1,651 |
53 | George Diaz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,615 |
54 | Manuel Izaguirre Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,575 |
55 | Jose Luis Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,570 |
56 | Celinda S Alvarado | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $1,560 |
57 | Dora F Pena | Alton, TX 78573 | $1,553 |
58 | Maria Oralia Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,524 |
59 | Ruperto Baldemar Escobar | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,518 |
60 | Maria Isabel Alaniz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $1,486 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”