Farm Subsidy information
Starr County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Starr County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 425
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $5,908,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Oscar Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $12,980 |
42 | Manuel L Elizondo | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $12,629 |
43 | Jose Arturo Garza Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $11,817 |
44 | , | $11,022 | |
45 | Roberto Saul Margo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $10,782 |
46 | San Marcos Ranch Lp | Mission, TX 78574 | $10,655 |
47 | , | $10,315 | |
48 | Osmar Ociel Mendoza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $10,131 |
49 | Gerardo Garcia | Linn, TX 78563 | $10,101 |
50 | Roel Santa Maria | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $10,000 |
51 | Jorge Alberto Gonzalez | Roma, TX 78584 | $9,782 |
52 | , | $9,608 | |
53 | Gloria B Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $9,574 |
54 | Rafael Ricardo Ramirez | San Antonio, TX 78240 | $9,550 |
55 | Ricardo R Salinas | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $9,311 |
56 | Running E Cattle Co LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $9,288 |
57 | Dora F Pena | Alton, TX 78573 | $9,240 |
58 | Jose G Longoria Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $9,162 |
59 | Victor D Garcia Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $9,036 |
60 | Dora Sylvia S Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $9,025 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”