Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 192
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $490,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Fausto Salinas Sr | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $2,500 |
62 | Silverio H Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $2,500 |
63 | Raul Hernandez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
64 | Noel Arturo Zamora | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $2,500 |
65 | Romeo Tadeo Flores | Pharr, TX 78577 | $2,500 |
66 | Elodia Salinas | Mission, TX 78572 | $2,500 |
67 | Silvestre Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
68 | Olivia O Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
69 | Estefana R Vela | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $2,500 |
70 | Heberto Barrera | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
71 | Flavio Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
72 | Minerva G Alvarez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
73 | Humberto E Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
74 | Don Cameron Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $2,500 |
75 | Jose Pedro Olivares | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
76 | Abel N Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,500 |
77 | Ramiro G Munoz | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,500 |
78 | Joel Ozuna | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $2,500 |
79 | Rolando Munoz | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,500 |
80 | Jose Cristobal Guerra | Mission, TX 78572 | $2,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”