Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 234
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $436,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Graciela S Requenez | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $1,163 |
82 | Alfredo Javier Martinez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,162 |
83 | Roberto J Gonzalez | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $1,162 |
84 | Maria Ramona G Flores | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,129 |
85 | Roel Santa Maria | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,107 |
86 | Isidro Garcia | Mission, TX 78573 | $1,071 |
87 | Miguel A Martinez | Mcallen, TX 78503 | $1,070 |
88 | Enrique E Gonzalez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,060 |
89 | Rolando Gonzalez | Penitas, TX 78576 | $1,055 |
90 | Gloria F Zarate | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,040 |
91 | Jose A Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,037 |
92 | Jose Arturo Garza Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $1,031 |
93 | Maria E Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,006 |
94 | Arnaldo Zarate | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,003 |
95 | Isabel Saenz Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $1,002 |
96 | Octavio Perez Jr | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $1,001 |
97 | C R Pena Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,000 |
98 | Edgar Leonel Salinas | Corinth, TX 76208 | $999 |
99 | Romeo G Canales | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $988 |
100 | Dilia Sulema Villarreal | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $975 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”