Farm Subsidy information
Starr County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Starr County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 394
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $9,470,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Doublehook Land & Cattle LLC | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $10,341 |
82 | Eleazar Eden Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $10,182 |
83 | Alberto Ramon Olivares | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $10,165 |
84 | Mauricio Garza Iv | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $9,941 |
85 | Running E Cattle Co LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $9,864 |
86 | Gonzalez Bros | Roma, TX 78584 | $9,797 |
87 | , | $9,343 | |
88 | Guadalupe Perez Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $9,164 |
89 | Santana Eduardo Carrera | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $8,371 |
90 | Graciela S Requenez | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $7,854 |
91 | Wj Davis Jr Farms LLC | Victoria, TX 77901 | $7,752 |
92 | Jose Luis Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $7,742 |
93 | , | $7,733 | |
94 | Cynthia S Valdez | San Antonio, TX 78245 | $7,577 |
95 | Rene Munoz Iv | Roma, TX 78584 | $7,576 |
96 | Omar Ricardo Montalvo | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $7,496 |
97 | Miguel A Martinez | Mcallen, TX 78503 | $7,448 |
98 | Rosa E Ibanez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $7,331 |
99 | Amaro Salinas | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $7,317 |
100 | Pedro Laurel Iv | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $7,283 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”