Counter Cyclical Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 264
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $6,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Roel R Ramirez Enterprises Inc | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $6,317 |
82 | Silverio H Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $6,053 |
83 | Blas Pedro Saenz Sr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $6,012 |
84 | Bryan W Livingston | Center, TX 75935 | $5,999 |
85 | Ronnie Livingston | Timpson, TX 75975 | $5,999 |
86 | Salvador Garcia Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,893 |
87 | Ernesto Cepeda | Miami, FL 33187 | $5,727 |
88 | Wilkins Family Limited Partnershi | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $5,474 |
89 | Cj Farms | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $5,404 |
90 | Faustino Garza | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $5,161 |
91 | Francisco Guerra Iv | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $5,115 |
92 | H K Ranch II | Mission, TX 78572 | $4,932 |
93 | Paula R Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,746 |
94 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $4,737 |
95 | Tomas Garcia | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $4,719 |
96 | Darian J Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $4,683 |
97 | Gilberto Garza Jr | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $4,502 |
98 | Silverio Gabriel Saenz | Mission, TX 78573 | $4,449 |
99 | Santa Cruz Properties-ltd | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $4,416 |
100 | Miguel A Garcia | Grulla, TX 78548 | $4,358 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”