Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 354
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,327,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Noel Arturo Zamora | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $4,092 |
82 | Cynthia S Valdez | San Antonio, TX 78245 | $4,092 |
83 | Eleazar Eden Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,004 |
84 | David E Guerrero | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,998 |
85 | Jose Luis Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,997 |
86 | Margarito Bermudez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,987 |
87 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $3,984 |
88 | Marcelo Alaniz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $3,978 |
89 | Villa Nueva Farms | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $3,888 |
90 | Gilberto Garza Jr | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $3,864 |
91 | Eloy Zarate Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,857 |
92 | Leroy Jackson - Jackson Living Trust | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $3,802 |
93 | Jorge E Pena | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $3,763 |
94 | Jewel M Peterson | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,745 |
95 | Dilia Sulema Villarreal | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $3,727 |
96 | Mario A Guillen | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,721 |
97 | Leoncio Salinas | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $3,697 |
98 | Roel Barrera | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,663 |
99 | Roel A Rodriguez | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $3,619 |
100 | Raul Garza | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $3,565 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”