Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Starr County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 331
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $455,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | Gerardo Garcia | Linn, TX 78563 | $1,452 |
| 82 | Ranchito San Miguel LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,448 |
| 83 | Margarito Bermudez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,376 |
| 84 | Noel Arturo Zamora | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $1,370 |
| 85 | Octavio Perez Jr | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $1,356 |
| 86 | Placido Pena Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,347 |
| 87 | David E Guerrero | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,338 |
| 88 | Jose Luis Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,337 |
| 89 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $1,334 |
| 90 | Jewel M Peterson | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,306 |
| 91 | Eleazar Elizondo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,302 |
| 92 | Julian J Carrera | Mission, TX 78574 | $1,294 |
| 93 | Gilberto Garza Jr | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $1,294 |
| 94 | Eloy Zarate Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,292 |
| 95 | , | $1,271 | |
| 96 | Jorge E Pena | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $1,261 |
| 97 | Mario A Guillen | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,246 |
| 98 | Dilia Sulema Villarreal | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $1,238 |
| 99 | Guerra Cattle Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,225 |
| 100 | Robert Lemons | Mission, TX 78572 | $1,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
