Total Commodity Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 153
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $94,018 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Faustino Garza | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $182 |
82 | Juan M Garcia | Grulla, TX 78548 | $182 |
83 | Graciela S Requenez | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $182 |
84 | Adolfo Pena Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $173 |
85 | Jorge Eduardo Canales | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $165 |
86 | Francisco Chapa III | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $165 |
87 | Cesar Cervantez | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $165 |
88 | Eviel Ely Moreno | Roma, TX 78584 | $165 |
89 | Isidro Garcia | Mission, TX 78573 | $165 |
90 | Lazaro Moreno | Falcon Heights, TX 78545 | $165 |
91 | Derly F Guerra | Mission, TX 78572 | $165 |
92 | C R Pena Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $157 |
93 | Raul Garza | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $157 |
94 | Ruben Roberto Guerra | Roma, TX 78584 | $157 |
95 | Fernando Garza | Roma, TX 78584 | $157 |
96 | Amaro Salinas | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $157 |
97 | Idolina Flores | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $157 |
98 | Placido Pena Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $149 |
99 | Maria Oralia Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $149 |
100 | Jose Cristobal Guerra | Mission, TX 78572 | $149 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”