Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Starr County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 150
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $81,858 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Alberto A Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $140 |
102 | Rolando Gonzalez | Penitas, TX 78576 | $140 |
103 | Agustin Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $140 |
104 | Jorge E Pena | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $140 |
105 | Renato Chavez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $140 |
106 | Leroy Jackson - Jackson Living Trust | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $140 |
107 | Jorge Luis Zapata | Falcon Heights, TX 78545 | $132 |
108 | Maria Isabel Alaniz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $132 |
109 | Heraldo Gonzalez | Roma, TX 78584 | $132 |
110 | Margarito Bermudez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $132 |
111 | Romeo G Canales | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $124 |
112 | Arturo Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $124 |
113 | Antonio Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $124 |
114 | Santana Eduardo Carrera | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $116 |
115 | Arnulfo Moreno | Roma, TX 78584 | $116 |
116 | Daniel S Lopez | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $116 |
117 | Raul Hernandez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $107 |
118 | Leonel Laurel | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $107 |
119 | Ruben Munoz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $107 |
120 | Manuel L Elizondo | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $99 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”