Counter Cyclical Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 264
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $6,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | El Toro Builders Inc | Mission, TX 78572 | $4,207 |
102 | Andy Hernandez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,101 |
103 | Blas Pedro Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $3,961 |
104 | Raul Garza | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $3,744 |
105 | Longoria Amtac Inc | Mission, TX 78572 | $3,731 |
106 | Juan Diego Saenz | Grulla, TX 78548 | $3,705 |
107 | Robert H Garnett Trust | San Antonio, TX 78299 | $3,407 |
108 | Patricia G Wray Trust | San Antonio, TX 78299 | $3,407 |
109 | John S Garnett Trust | San Antonio, TX 78299 | $3,400 |
110 | Patricia Garnett Wray Trust | San Antonio, TX 78299 | $3,400 |
111 | John S Garnett | San Antonio, TX 78299 | $3,398 |
112 | Elida D Cavazos | Mission, TX 78572 | $3,292 |
113 | Daniel Rivas | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $3,114 |
114 | Douglas R Semmes Jr Trust | San Antonio, TX 78299 | $2,931 |
115 | M Stavropoulos Ltd Agency | San Antonio, TX 78265 | $2,931 |
116 | Susie D Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $2,760 |
117 | Emilio F Gutierrez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,734 |
118 | Manuel R Gutierrez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,734 |
119 | Bob & Penny Garnett Trust | San Antonio, TX 78299 | $2,565 |
120 | Everardo Garcia Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,555 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”