Total Disaster Programs in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,178
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $36,450,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Placido Pena Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $72,077 |
102 | La Anacua Ranch | Roma, TX 78584 | $72,070 |
103 | Jose G Longoria Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $71,685 |
104 | B & L Farms Inc | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $70,512 |
105 | Romeo G Canales | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $70,379 |
106 | Dora R Canales | Roma, TX 78584 | $70,265 |
107 | Leonel Cepeda | Roma, TX 78584 | $70,228 |
108 | Guillermo Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $70,194 |
109 | Ignacia G Gutierrez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $70,013 |
110 | Oscar Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $69,811 |
111 | Clodin R Laurel | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $69,612 |
112 | Maria E Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $67,915 |
113 | Salinas Bros Ranch | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $67,851 |
114 | Gloria B Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $67,115 |
115 | George Adam Fike Jr | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $66,862 |
116 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $66,609 |
117 | Ida Lou Perez | Roma, TX 78584 | $65,879 |
118 | Silvestre Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $65,151 |
119 | Darian J Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $64,573 |
120 | Uriel Moreno | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $64,466 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”