Total Disaster Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 354
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $5,605,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ranchito San Miguel LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $6,070 |
102 | Rolando Gonzalez | Penitas, TX 78576 | $6,064 |
103 | David E Guerrero | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $6,040 |
104 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $6,019 |
105 | Silverio Gabriel Saenz | Mission, TX 78573 | $5,952 |
106 | Noel Eloy Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,904 |
107 | Jewel M Peterson | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,868 |
108 | Gilberto Garza Jr | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $5,840 |
109 | , | $5,810 | |
110 | Julian J Carrera | Mission, TX 78574 | $5,785 |
111 | Richard D Garza-ray | Roma, TX 78584 | $5,761 |
112 | Jorge E Pena | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $5,690 |
113 | Mario A Guillen | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,621 |
114 | Roel Santa Maria | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,605 |
115 | Dilia Sulema Villarreal | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $5,593 |
116 | Marcelo Alaniz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $5,570 |
117 | Heron Alaniz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,547 |
118 | Andres G Canales | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $5,535 |
119 | Roel A Rodriguez | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $5,467 |
120 | Robert Lemons | Mission, TX 78572 | $5,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”