Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 354
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,327,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Isabel Saenz Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $3,565 |
102 | Julian J Carrera | Mission, TX 78574 | $3,518 |
103 | Everardo Garcia Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,510 |
104 | Cesar Cervantez | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $3,470 |
105 | Doublehook Land & Cattle LLC | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $3,438 |
106 | Richard D Garza-ray | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,427 |
107 | Eduardo R Izaguirre Jr | Spring Branch, TX 78070 | $3,403 |
108 | Robert Lemons | Mission, TX 78572 | $3,384 |
109 | Bernardo Garcia | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $3,367 |
110 | Alonzo H Alvarez | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,309 |
111 | Danissa A Garza | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $3,308 |
112 | Heron Alaniz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,303 |
113 | Romeo Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,253 |
114 | Geronimo Guerra Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,227 |
115 | Jose A Garcia | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,187 |
116 | Pedro A Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,144 |
117 | Rosalba B Cortez | Falcon Heights, TX 78545 | $3,125 |
118 | Alberto A Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,099 |
119 | Michael J Acevedo | Palmview, TX 78572 | $3,098 |
120 | George Diaz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,051 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”