Total Commodity Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 264
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,184,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Abel A Laurel | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,271 |
102 | William Thomas Guerra Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $1,250 |
103 | Roel X Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,217 |
104 | Leonel Cepeda | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,207 |
105 | Michael J Acevedo | Palmview, TX 78572 | $1,192 |
106 | Roberto Saul Margo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,176 |
107 | Graciela S Requenez | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $1,163 |
108 | Alfredo Javier Martinez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,162 |
109 | Roberto J Gonzalez | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $1,162 |
110 | Maria Ramona G Flores | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,129 |
111 | Roel Santa Maria | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,107 |
112 | Miguel A Martinez | Mcallen, TX 78503 | $1,070 |
113 | Enrique E Gonzalez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,060 |
114 | Rolando Gonzalez | Penitas, TX 78576 | $1,055 |
115 | Gloria F Zarate | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,040 |
116 | Jose A Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,037 |
117 | Jose Arturo Garza Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $1,031 |
118 | Maria E Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,006 |
119 | Arnaldo Zarate | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $1,003 |
120 | Isabel Saenz Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $1,002 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”