Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 234
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $436,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Juan M Garcia | Grulla, TX 78548 | $673 |
122 | Marcelo Alaniz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $671 |
123 | Margarito Alaniz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $671 |
124 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $668 |
125 | Eleazar Elizondo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $667 |
126 | Cesar Cervantez | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $644 |
127 | Jose Garza Jr | Zapata, TX 78076 | $633 |
128 | Efrain Garcia | Palmhurst, TX 78573 | $622 |
129 | Blas Maria Saenz Sr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $617 |
130 | El Rucio Land & Cattle Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $612 |
131 | Eloy Vera | Roma, TX 78584 | $604 |
132 | Jose G Longoria Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $604 |
133 | Antonio Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $604 |
134 | Everardo Garcia Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $601 |
135 | Danissa A Garza | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $591 |
136 | Michael Paul Alaniz | Alamo, TX 78516 | $588 |
137 | Ruben Roberto Guerra | Roma, TX 78584 | $583 |
138 | Romeo Ozuna | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $581 |
139 | Alberto Flores | Roma, TX 78584 | $563 |
140 | Pedro Laurel Iv | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $554 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”