Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 328
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $3,244,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | 2 M Ranch Inc | Mission, TX 78572 | $5,528 |
122 | Grande Butane Co Inc | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,514 |
123 | Carlos Bermudez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,299 |
124 | Santos Canales Jr | Premont, TX 78375 | $5,227 |
125 | Guadalupe Munoz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,171 |
126 | Robert Reuben Guerra Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $5,161 |
127 | Guadalupe M Castaneda Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,060 |
128 | Noe G Garza | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $4,969 |
129 | Tomas D Garcia | Roma, TX 78584 | $4,875 |
130 | Sixto Flores Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,865 |
131 | Luzelma Rosales | Mission, TX 78574 | $4,725 |
132 | Martin Jaime Olivares | Austin, TX 78759 | $4,596 |
133 | Flavio Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,595 |
134 | Joel Ozuna | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $4,559 |
135 | Roberto Corona Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,484 |
136 | Falcon 'el Llano' Ranch | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,465 |
137 | Maria E Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,402 |
138 | Horacio S Ramirez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $4,334 |
139 | Ventura Hernandez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,308 |
140 | Vidal H Saenz | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $4,268 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”