Total Commodity Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 264
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,184,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Octavio Perez Jr | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $1,001 |
122 | C R Pena Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $1,000 |
123 | Edgar Leonel Salinas | Corinth, TX 76208 | $999 |
124 | Ruben Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $990 |
125 | Romeo G Canales | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $988 |
126 | Dilia Sulema Villarreal | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $975 |
127 | Derly F Guerra | Mission, TX 78572 | $951 |
128 | Frances S Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $945 |
129 | Octavio Nieves Laurel | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $945 |
130 | Cynthia S Valdez | San Antonio, TX 78245 | $927 |
131 | Amaro Salinas | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $920 |
132 | Manuel L Elizondo | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $917 |
133 | Martin A Canales Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $888 |
134 | Noe Ricardo Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $880 |
135 | Thomas D Koeneke | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $859 |
136 | Bernardo Garcia | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $858 |
137 | Ismael Guerra III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $842 |
138 | Jorge Eduardo Canales | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $841 |
139 | Noel Trevino | Roma, TX 78584 | $839 |
140 | Melecio Longoria | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $810 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”