Total Commodity Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 153
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $94,018 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Leonel Laurel | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $107 |
122 | Ruben Munoz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $107 |
123 | Manuel L Elizondo | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $99 |
124 | Jewel M Peterson | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $99 |
125 | Guillermo Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $99 |
126 | Omar S Salinas | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $99 |
127 | Michael Paul Alaniz | Alamo, TX 78516 | $99 |
128 | Everardo Garcia Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $99 |
129 | Omar Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $91 |
130 | David T Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $91 |
131 | Jorge Chapa | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $83 |
132 | Dora Alicia Facturan | Mission, TX 78574 | $83 |
133 | Isabel Saenz Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $83 |
134 | Victor Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $83 |
135 | Francisco Hilario Chapa | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $83 |
136 | Danelo I Gonzalez Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $83 |
137 | Juan Luis Longoria | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $74 |
138 | Adan H Figueroa Sr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $74 |
139 | Romana E Leal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $74 |
140 | Roel O Guerra Sr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $74 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”