Total Commodity Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 264
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,184,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Francisco Chapa III | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $798 |
142 | Heraldo Gonzalez | Roma, TX 78584 | $780 |
143 | Alberto A Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $776 |
144 | Rosendo Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $759 |
145 | Jaime Heron Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $759 |
146 | Pedro A Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $743 |
147 | Jorge Luis Garza | Houston, TX 77044 | $735 |
148 | Flavio A. Garza Jr | Zapata, TX 78076 | $696 |
149 | Juan P Escobar | Roma, TX 78584 | $685 |
150 | Ricardo Belmontes | Roma, TX 78584 | $677 |
151 | Juan M Garcia | Grulla, TX 78548 | $673 |
152 | Marcelo Alaniz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $671 |
153 | Margarito Alaniz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $671 |
154 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $668 |
155 | Eleazar Elizondo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $667 |
156 | Guillermo Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $660 |
157 | Cesar Cervantez | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $644 |
158 | Jose Garza Jr | Zapata, TX 78076 | $633 |
159 | Efrain Garcia | Palmhurst, TX 78573 | $622 |
160 | Blas Maria Saenz Sr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $617 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”