Total Commodity Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 264
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,184,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | El Rucio Land & Cattle Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $612 |
162 | Omar Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $605 |
163 | Eloy Vera | Roma, TX 78584 | $604 |
164 | Antonio Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $604 |
165 | Everardo Garcia Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $601 |
166 | Danissa A Garza | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $591 |
167 | Michael Paul Alaniz | Alamo, TX 78516 | $588 |
168 | Ruben Roberto Guerra | Roma, TX 78584 | $583 |
169 | Romeo Ozuna | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $581 |
170 | Alberto Flores | Roma, TX 78584 | $563 |
171 | Pedro Laurel Iv | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $554 |
172 | Elvira G Canales | Salineno, TX 78585 | $553 |
173 | Reyna M Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $552 |
174 | Jose Cristobal Guerra | Mission, TX 78572 | $551 |
175 | 3 F Developers LLC | Mission, TX 78573 | $547 |
176 | Drfea Enterprises Inc | The Woodlands, TX 77382 | $547 |
177 | Adolfo Pena Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $536 |
178 | Catclaw Ltd | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $529 |
179 | Jewel M Peterson | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $526 |
180 | Santana Eduardo Carrera | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $519 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”