Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 247
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $2,517,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Starr Feedyards Ltd | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $431,250 |
2 | San Felipe Outfitters Lp | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $236,348 |
3 | Chapotal Farms | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $171,590 |
4 | Aracely Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $89,071 |
5 | Wesley J Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $88,216 |
6 | Don Cameron Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $57,205 |
7 | Raul Villarreal | Delmita, TX 78536 | $56,956 |
8 | F M Cattle Co | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $53,895 |
9 | Helen L Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $48,609 |
10 | Kyle Ruppert | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $42,066 |
11 | Ashley Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $35,647 |
12 | Exiquio Saenz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $30,284 |
13 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $29,873 |
14 | Arnulfo J Garza | Pharr, TX 78577 | $29,479 |
15 | Jose Garza Jr | Zapata, TX 78076 | $28,156 |
16 | Alberto Martinez | Roma, TX 78584 | $27,182 |
17 | White Rock Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $23,517 |
18 | El Triangulo Cattle Co | Roma, TX 78584 | $22,755 |
19 | Ociel Mendoza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $22,409 |
20 | Jack Dillon Scoggins | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $22,260 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>