Farm Subsidy information
Starr County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Starr County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 425
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $5,908,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | , | $79,927 | |
2 | Arnulfo J Garza | Pharr, TX 78577 | $69,803 |
3 | F M Cattle Co | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $55,570 |
4 | Raul Villarreal | Delmita, TX 78536 | $47,947 |
5 | El Triangulo Cattle Co | Roma, TX 78584 | $42,789 |
6 | Alejandro T Martinez | Linn, TX 78563 | $28,281 |
7 | Amandos Beefmasters Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $27,918 |
8 | Leonel Lopez III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $26,193 |
9 | Cesar Rosales | Mission, TX 78574 | $26,005 |
10 | Alfonso H Perez | Roma, TX 78584 | $25,254 |
11 | Tomas E Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $23,861 |
12 | R E Schiefelbein III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $23,105 |
13 | , | $22,270 | |
14 | Ana Lisa Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $21,618 |
15 | Dora P Villarreal | Guerra, TX 78360 | $21,032 |
16 | Paula R Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $20,658 |
17 | Blas Pedro Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $20,550 |
18 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $20,057 |
19 | Ida Lou Perez | Roma, TX 78584 | $19,819 |
20 | Lucio Eden Gonzalez Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $18,671 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>