Counter Cyclical Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 264
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $6,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | J M Martinez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $29,475 |
42 | Juan Villanueva III | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $28,959 |
43 | T F Prukop Farms | Mission, TX 78572 | $28,814 |
44 | Jose G Longoria Jr | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $21,663 |
45 | Southwest Farm & Ranch Inc | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $20,661 |
46 | Ranchito San Miguel LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $20,333 |
47 | Jim I Mills | Mission, TX 78572 | $19,839 |
48 | J R Brock | Austin, TX 78701 | $19,803 |
49 | Wilfred J Klement | Mission, TX 78573 | $19,796 |
50 | Skloss Farms | Mission, TX 78573 | $17,596 |
51 | Luzelma Rosales | Mission, TX 78574 | $17,097 |
52 | Jose G Longoria Sr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $16,548 |
53 | Las Animas Indust & Commercial In | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $15,754 |
54 | Ranch R E Holdings Ltd | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $15,417 |
55 | Rincon Farms Inc | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $15,153 |
56 | Otto Wagner Jr | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $15,064 |
57 | Corydon J Kobernat | San Antonio, TX 78233 | $15,042 |
58 | Gregory G Kobernat | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $15,042 |
59 | Anne M Littlefield | Santa Fe, NM 87501 | $15,042 |
60 | Steven J Kobernat | San Antonio, TX 78210 | $15,042 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”