Conservation Reserve Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 319
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $35,088,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | San Roman Farms Ptn | Sebastian, TX 78594 | $2,022,295 |
2 | San Sebastian Farms | Sebastian, TX 78594 | $1,868,653 |
3 | Chapotal Farms | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $1,526,616 |
4 | Burns Farms Partnership | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $807,464 |
5 | J M Martinez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $756,758 |
6 | Southwest Farm & Ranch Inc | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $665,936 |
7 | Leonard J Kobernat | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $658,795 |
8 | Blas Pedro Saenz Sr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $645,588 |
9 | Blanca M Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $611,199 |
10 | J R Brock | Austin, TX 78701 | $569,504 |
11 | Arturo D Ibarra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $565,997 |
12 | Don Cameron Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $563,737 |
13 | William B Osborn III | San Antonio, TX 78217 | $544,117 |
14 | Carricitos Farms | Sebastian, TX 78594 | $543,759 |
15 | Villa Nueva Farms | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $518,708 |
16 | Abel Villanueva | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $510,181 |
17 | Cotton And Grain Producers | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $505,005 |
18 | Juan Villanueva III | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $500,225 |
19 | Blas Pedro Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $437,065 |
20 | Wilson Partnership | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $424,747 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>