Total Emergency Relief Program in Starr County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $3,783,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chapotal Farms | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $1,442,008 |
2 | Ashley Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $329,225 |
3 | Aracely Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $298,719 |
4 | Wesley J Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $276,060 |
5 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $252,458 |
6 | Helen L Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $216,825 |
7 | Wesley J Vanderpool Jr | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $204,751 |
8 | G & H Farms | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $203,999 |
9 | Starr Feedyards Ltd | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $87,326 |
10 | Respondek Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $80,564 |
11 | White Rock Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $50,096 |
12 | Ociel Mendoza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $37,271 |
13 | , | $25,938 | |
14 | San Felipe Outfitters Lp | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $19,686 |
15 | Darian J Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $18,492 |
16 | Eusebio Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $16,276 |
17 | , | $14,906 | |
18 | San Marcos Ranch Lp | Mission, TX 78574 | $14,744 |
19 | Alberto Martinez | Roma, TX 78584 | $13,288 |
20 | , | $13,113 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>