Total Commodity Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 304
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $5,325,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roberto De Leon-rodriguez | Mcallen, TX 78503 | $36,163 |
22 | Ashley Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $35,647 |
23 | Eusebio Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $35,251 |
24 | Reavis Farms Inc | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $33,561 |
25 | Lothringer Family Farms, LLC | Dilley, TX 78017 | $31,817 |
26 | Kyle Ruppert | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $30,546 |
27 | Arturo D Ibarra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $28,721 |
28 | Alberto Martinez | Roma, TX 78584 | $27,282 |
29 | Felitos Finest LLC | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $26,799 |
30 | Exiquio Saenz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $26,419 |
31 | Romualdo Solis Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $25,897 |
32 | Jaime T Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $25,646 |
33 | Ociel Mendoza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $24,783 |
34 | Guadalupe Perez Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $24,778 |
35 | El Triangulo Cattle Co | Roma, TX 78584 | $23,073 |
36 | Jack Dillon Scoggins | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $21,796 |
37 | Jorge E Falcon | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $20,934 |
38 | Lauro H & Dora M Salinas Trust | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $19,965 |
39 | J & R Feedlot LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $19,184 |
40 | Ana Lisa Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $18,195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”