Total Commodity Programs in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 264
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,184,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Arnulfo J Garza | Pharr, TX 78577 | $7,363 |
| 22 | Ociel Mendoza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $7,196 |
| 23 | Exiquio Saenz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $7,055 |
| 24 | Roberto De Leon-rodriguez | Mcallen, TX 78503 | $6,589 |
| 25 | G L And C LLC | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $6,477 |
| 26 | Carlos Bermudez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $6,325 |
| 27 | El Triangulo Cattle Co | Roma, TX 78584 | $6,227 |
| 28 | Guadalupe Perez Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $5,560 |
| 29 | J & R Feedlot LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,559 |
| 30 | Lauro H & Dora M Salinas Trust | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,510 |
| 31 | Jaime T Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,437 |
| 32 | Alberto Martinez | Roma, TX 78584 | $5,400 |
| 33 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $4,984 |
| 34 | Eugene S Mackie Family Limited Partnership | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $4,658 |
| 35 | Jorge E Falcon | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,468 |
| 36 | Norberto Salinas | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $4,434 |
| 37 | Darian J Kotzur | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $4,432 |
| 38 | Leonel Lopez III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,422 |
| 39 | Ana Lisa Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,244 |
| 40 | Jack Dillon Scoggins | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,654 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf